Ketchum, Konkel, Barrett, Nickel & Austin v. Heritage Mountain Development Co.
Utah Court of Appeals
784 P.2d 1217 (1989)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Heritage Mountain Development Company (defendant) acquired land to develop a ski resort. Heritage hired the architecture and design firm of Ketchum, Konkel, Barrett, Nickel & Austin (Ketchum) (plaintiffs). Ketchum began surveying and design work in April. Heritage acquired a loan from Guaranty Savings and Loan Association in June and Guaranty recorded a trust deed as security on the property in September. Offsite design work continued, but no onsite work beyond staking for surveying purposes occurred. Heritage failed to obtain further financing and abandoned the project. Ketchum sought to foreclose on their mechanic’s lien on the property. Guaranty moved for partial summary judgement alleging that their trust deed had priority over all mechanic’s liens on the property. The district court held the Guaranty trust deed had priority because construction work had not commenced as of the date Guaranty filed the trust deed. Ketchum appealed, claiming that the offsite design work amounted to a commencement of work before Guaranty filed the deed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Billings, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.