Ketchum v. Gulf Oil Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
798 F.2d 159 (1986)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
Gulf Oil Corporation (defendant) owned a drilling platform. Gulf contracted with Dresser Industries, Inc. (Dresser) to perform wireline work and with the Huthnance Drilling Company (Huthnance) (defendant) to operate cranes. Russell Ketchum (plaintiff), a Dresser employee, was injured on the platform due to the actions of a Huthnance crane operator. Ketchum received workers’-compensation benefits from Dresser under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act. Ketchum also filed a personal-injury action against Gulf Oil and Huthnance. Gulf Oil and Huthnance then filed a third-party indemnity complaint against Dresser for any amounts for which they may have been found to be liable to Ketchum. The district court dismissed Gulf Oil and Huthnance’s third-party complaint on summary judgment, and Gulf Oil and Huthnance appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Politz, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.