Key Bank v. Milham
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
141 F.3d 420 (1998)
- Written by Philip Glass, JD
Facts
On April 24, 1996, Ronald and Benedetta Milham (the Milhams) (debtors) filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy. The Milhams’ debt with Key Bank (creditor) was secured by an automobile worth more than the debt. Against Key Bank’s objection, the Milhams selected the cramdown option for determining interest, entailing the court computing an interest rate designed to restore the collateral’s original value by using as its basis the principal amount owed at the plan confirmation date, calculated in light of the installment-payment schedule. Key Bank possessed a lien on the automobile, and the Milhams would have to pay Key Bank after plan confirmation. Key Bank insisted that its oversecured-creditor status entitled it to the contract interest rate of 9.5 percent on both the principal and the interest rather than the court-determined 8.5 percent rate, a proposal that would result in compound interest. The bankruptcy court imposed the 8.5 percent rate. Key Bank appealed to an appellate panel, which affirmed the court’s decision. Key Bank again appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.