Keyser v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

648 F.3d 721 (2011)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Keyser v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
648 F.3d 721 (2011)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Pamela Keyser (plaintiff) suffered from severe emphysema, depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and schizotypal personality traits. Keyser had previously worked as a cashier in a role that required prolonged standing but was unable to continue working due to her physical and mental ailments. Keyser applied for social security disability (SSD) benefits based on her combined ailments. In Keyser’s application, her treating physicians reported that Keyser’s emphysema was severe enough to prevent her from working. Keyser’s psychiatrist, Dr. Monteverdi, assessed Keyser’s functionality as moderately impaired in a variety of areas impacting her ability to work. On behalf of the Social Security Administration, Dr. Lahman prepared a Psychiatric Review Technique Form (PRTF), which stated that Keyser suffered from mild functional impairments impacting her ability to conduct daily activities, maintain concentration, and maintain social functioning. At a hearing before an administrative-law judge (ALJ) regarding Keyser’s SSD application, a vocational expert testified that Keyser was unable to perform her prior cashier’s job, which required extended standing, but that she could perform a seated cashier’s job. The ALJ denied Keyser SSD benefits. In a written decision, the ALJ held that sedentary cashier positions were readily available and were within Keyser’s ability to perform. The ALJ failed to append a PRTF to the decision and failed to include specific findings regarding Keyser’s mental functionality. Keyser appealed the ALJ’s decision to the federal district court, which affirmed. Keyser then appealed to the Ninth Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership