Keyser v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
648 F.3d 721 (2011)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Pamela Keyser (plaintiff) suffered from severe emphysema, depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and schizotypal personality traits. Keyser had previously worked as a cashier in a role that required prolonged standing but was unable to continue working due to her physical and mental ailments. Keyser applied for social security disability (SSD) benefits based on her combined ailments. In Keyser’s application, her treating physicians reported that Keyser’s emphysema was severe enough to prevent her from working. Keyser’s psychiatrist, Dr. Monteverdi, assessed Keyser’s functionality as moderately impaired in a variety of areas impacting her ability to work. On behalf of the Social Security Administration, Dr. Lahman prepared a Psychiatric Review Technique Form (PRTF), which stated that Keyser suffered from mild functional impairments impacting her ability to conduct daily activities, maintain concentration, and maintain social functioning. At a hearing before an administrative-law judge (ALJ) regarding Keyser’s SSD application, a vocational expert testified that Keyser was unable to perform her prior cashier’s job, which required extended standing, but that she could perform a seated cashier’s job. The ALJ denied Keyser SSD benefits. In a written decision, the ALJ held that sedentary cashier positions were readily available and were within Keyser’s ability to perform. The ALJ failed to append a PRTF to the decision and failed to include specific findings regarding Keyser’s mental functionality. Keyser appealed the ALJ’s decision to the federal district court, which affirmed. Keyser then appealed to the Ninth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.