Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

Kibler v. Frank L. Garrett & Sons, Inc.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc
439 P.2d 416 (1968)


Facts

Frank L. Garrett & Sons, Inc. (Garrett) (defendant) hired Kibler (plaintiff) to harvest its wheat crop. The parties did not agree on the price to be paid, and Kibler told Garrett that the price charged could be affected by circumstances occurring during the harvest. When the work was complete, Kibler submitted an invoice based on 25 cents per bushel. He then sent a substitute invoice based on 20 cents per bushel, amounting to a total charge of $876.20. Garrett responded with a check for $444 and a letter stating, in relevant part, that the $444 was 50 percent more than what Garrett paid the previous year for the same work and 20 percent more than what Kibler agreed to. The letter further stated that the amount invoiced by Kibler was “ridiculous.” Kibler called his attorney and asked whether he could deposit the check. The attorney told him to read off any notations on the check. Kibler read off “Harvesting Wheat Washington Ranch,” which had been typed, and “Frank L. Garrett & Sons, Inc.,” which had been printed. He failed to see, or read to his attorney, a line of small type on the form check that read, “By endorsement this check when paid is accepted in full payment of the following account.” With his attorney’s approval, Kibler deposited the check and brought suit against Garrett. After Kibler’s evidence was presented, the judge dismissed his claim on the grounds of accord and satisfaction even though Garrett had not raised accord and satisfaction as a defense to the claim. Kibler appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Rosellini, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Hale, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 121,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.