Kinch v. Fluke

166 A. 905 (1933)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kinch v. Fluke

Pennsylvania Supreme Court
166 A. 905 (1933)

Facts

In 1923, Kinch and his wife (plaintiffs) bought a home in Pennsylvania under an unrecorded purchase agreement. The house cost $6,000. Robert E. Fluke (defendant) was to hold title until the remaining balance of $3,738.86 was paid in $35 monthly installments. The Kinches moved into the home. Fluke later mortgaged the Kinch property for the amount of $3,000 to the Seaboard Company (Seaboard) and the amount of $700 to the Finance Company (Finance). Both Seaboard and Finance recorded the mortgages on the same day. The following year, an attorney helped the Kinches obtain a $4,000 mortgage from John C. Peightal. The attorney did not mention the Seaboard and Finance mortgages to the Kinches, because the attorney mistakenly believed that the Seaboard and Finance mortgages did not relate to the Kinch property. The Kinches used the $4,000 loaned by Peightal to pay Fluke the balance owed on the property. Fluke then deeded the property to the Kinches. The Kinches learned of the two mortgages after taking title and then brought an action to quiet title to the property. The trial court dismissed the action. The court held that because Seaboard and Finance had recorded the mortgages after the execution of the purchase agreement, but before title had passed, the Kinches had constructive notice of the Seaboard and Finance mortgages. The court also ruled that the Kinches had actual notice of the mortgages, because the Kinch attorney discovered it through a title search.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kephart, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 747,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 747,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 747,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership