King v. Beaufort County Board of Education
North Carolina Supreme Court
364 N.C. 368 (2010)
- Written by Ann Wooster, JD
Facts
A public-high-school student, Viktoria King (plaintiff) was involved in a fight at school and received a 10-day suspension. The principal also recommended long-term suspension as punishment. In February 2008, the Beaufort County Board of Education (county board) (defendant) adopted this recommendation and suspended King for the remainder of the school year without access to alternative education. This decision was upheld by a panel of central-office administrators who conducted a due-process hearing. King, through her parent (plaintiff) filed a complaint in the trial court and argued that the county board violated her right to a sound, basic education under the state constitution by failing to provide access to alternative education during the long-term suspension. King filed a motion, seeking injunctive and declaratory relief in the form of alternative-educational services provided by the county board during the remainder of her suspension. The trial court denied the motion and dismissed King’s complaint. The appeals court affirmed the ruling in favor of the county board. King appealed on the grounds that the county board was required to articulate a reason for denying access to alternative education during her long-term suspension.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Martin, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Timmons-Goodson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.