King v. Greene
Supreme Court of New Jersey
153 A.2d 49 (1959)
- Written by Rebecca Green, JD
Facts
In 1913, Marie King (plaintiff) acquired title to three lots of property. In 1931, her husband Phillip King sued her. The court found that Marie owed Phillip $1,225. The court also ordered that Marie convey the three lots of property to herself and Phillip as tenants by the entirety. In 1932, the property was sold at an execution sale to satisfy the 1931 money judgment. At the execution sale, John Crowell purchased Marie’s share of the tenancy by the entirety. A sheriff’s deed was issued to convey Marie’s interest to Crowell. In 1933, Phillip conveyed his interest in the property to Martin Smock. Crowell similarly sold Marie’s interest in the property to Smock. Phillip died in 1938. In 1946, Smock conveyed his interests to Joseph and Mabel Greene (defendants). In 1957, Marie sued the Greenes for possession, arguing that she was the sole owner of the property. Marie argued that the 1932 sheriff’s deed conveyed one-half the rents, issues, and profits of the property during the joint lives of Marie and Phillip, but the sheriff’s deed did not convey Marie’s right of survivorship. This would mean the sheriff’s deed conveyed essentially half of a joint life estate. Marie argued that once Phillip died, this joint life estate terminated, and the property went to Marie as the surviving party. The trial court agreed and declared Marie had fee-simple ownership in the property. The defendants appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Burling, J.)
Dissent (Weintraub, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.