Delaware Supreme Court
704 A.2d 839 (1998)
Hugh Kipp (defendant) was arrested for possession of a deadly weapon by a prohibited person after police discovered three guns and two hunting bows in Kipp’s house. Kipp had previously pled guilty to a misdemeanor charge of assault and was therefore prohibited from possessing deadly weapons. At trial, Kipp argued that he did not know he was prohibited from possessing deadly weapons because he was misled during his previous guilty plea. Kipp’s previous guilty-plea form showed that the form had been pre-marked “N/A” under a space that noted the plea would result in the loss of his right to possess deadly weapons. Kipp testified that he believed, and had been told, that he could still possess deadly weapons despite the guilty plea. Delaware’s statute criminalizing possession of a deadly weapon by a prohibited person provided that any person who had been convicted of a felony or crime of violence resulting in physical injury to another was prohibited from possessing deadly weapons. Although Kipp had pled guilty to a misdemeanor crime of violence that resulted in the injury of another person, neither the judge nor the prosecutor trying Kipp’s assault plea had corrected the error on the guilty-plea form. Moreover, Kipp testified at trial that he was told the prohibition against possessing weapons did not apply to him because he was only pleading guilty to a misdemeanor. Kipp was convicted of three counts of possession of a deadly weapon by a prohibited person. Kipp appealed to the Supreme Court of Delaware, arguing that he had a valid mistake-of-law defense. The state conceded error and submitted that Kipp’s judgments of conviction should be reversed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Holland, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 223,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.