Kirby Engineering v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

71 F. Supp. 2d 1363 (1999)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kirby Engineering v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
71 F. Supp. 2d 1363 (1999)

Facts

Australian firm Kirby Engineering (Kirby) (plaintiff) sued Norfolk Southern Railway Company (Norfolk Southern) (defendant) for damages after equipment owned by Kirby was damaged when the Norfolk Southern train carrying it derailed in Alabama. Kirby had originally contracted with International Cargo Control, Pty Ltd. (ICC) to ship the equipment from Australia to Alabama. ICC contracted with ocean carrier Hamburg Sud to transport the equipment overseas to Savannah, Georgia. Hamburg Sud, via its subsidiary, contracted with Norfolk Southern to complete the final leg of transport from Georgia to Alabama via rail. After the derailment and damage occurred, Kirby sued ICC and Hamburg Sud in Australian court, as prescribed by the forum-selection clauses in Kirby’s contracts with ICC and Hamburg Sud. Kirby then sued Norfolk Southern in US federal court, and Norfolk Southern moved to enjoin Kirby from pursuing the parallel proceedings against ICC and Hamburg Sud in Australia, arguing that Norfolk Southern would suffer procedural disadvantages if forced to litigate in Australia and that the simultaneous proceedings were duplicative.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Thrash, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership