Kirksey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

168 F.3d 1039 (1999)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kirksey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
168 F.3d 1039 (1999)

Facts

Kirksey, as executor of her husband’s estate (plaintiff), sued R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. and another cigarette manufacturer (defendants), alleging that the defendants were liable for hastening her husband’s death from lung cancer by: (1) falsely advertising that their cigarettes were not addictive and (2) adding addicting agents to their products without disclosing that fact. The federal court had jurisdiction on the basis of diversity; Kirksey’s claims were brought under Illinois law. The defendants moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 12(b)(6). Kirksey responded to the motion by arguing that she was not obligated, at this point in the litigation, to specify the legal bases for her claims. Kirksey further asserted that her claims were not easily characterized by existing legal doctrine and that her allegations met the pleading requirements of FRCP 8(a)(2). The district court held that Kirksey had waived her claims by failing to adequately respond to the defendants’ motion to dismiss. Kirksey appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 778,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 778,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 778,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership