Kittell v. Vermont Weatherboard, Inc.
Vermont Supreme Court
417 A.2d 926, 138 Vt. 439 (1980)
- Written by Serena Lipski, JD
Facts
Michael D. Kittell (plaintiff) was working for Vermont Weatherboard, Inc. (Weatherboard) (defendant) when he was injured on the job. At the time of his injury, Kittel, who was inexperienced and had no training, was operating a saw from which Weatherboard had removed all safety devices. A splinter flew through Kittel’s eye and into his head, causing severe injuries. Kittel filed a tort claim in state court against Weatherboard, arguing that his injury was outside the scope of workers’ compensation because of Weatherboard’s willful and wanton conduct in removing the safety devices and requiring him to operate the saw without training or experience. The trial court dismissed the complaint, holding that workers’ compensation was Kittel’s exclusive remedy. Kittel appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.