Klaassen v. Commissioner
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
182 F.3d 932, 83 A.F.T.R.2d 99-1750 (1999)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The Klaassens (plaintiffs) had ten children and an adjusted gross income of $83,056.42. On their federal income tax return the Klaassens claimed deductions for their state and local taxes, medical expenses, and 12 personal exemptions. The Klaassens resulting tax liability was $5,111.00. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) audited the Klaassens, and found that they owed an alternative minimum tax (AMT) of $1,085.43. The Klaassens appealed, claiming that the AMT was meant to apply only to wealthy people who claimed tax preference items under 26 U.S.C. § 57. The Klaassens did not challenge the IRS’s calculation of the AMT, only its application. The United States Tax Court affirmed the IRS’s interpretation. The Klaassens appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
Concurrence (Kelly, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.