Klamath Water Users Protective Association v. Patterson
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
204 F.3d 1206 (1999)
The United States Bureau of Reclamation (Bureau) (defendant) entered into, and renewed in 1956, a contract with the California Oregon Power Company (Copco) (defendant). The contract gave Copco the right to operate the Link River Dam (Dam), which the United States government owned. The Bureau and Copco were the only two parties to the contract. The Klamath Water Users Protective Association, et al. (plaintiffs) were irrigators that used the Dam. In 1997, the Bureau began the process of changing the operating plan for the Dam. The plaintiffs brought suit claiming that they were intended third party beneficiaries of the Bureau-Copco contract. Specifically, the plaintiffs relied on Article 2, which mentioned irrigation requirements of the Dam, and Article 6, which stated that Copco was not to use any water “when it may be needed or required by the United States or any irrigation or drainage district, person, or association obtaining water from the United States for use for . . . irrigation purposes.” Article 15 stated that the contract “binds and inures to the benefit of the parties hereto,” as well as their successors and assigns. The district court granted Copco’s motion for summary judgment. The plaintiffs appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Tashima, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 725,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 725,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.