Klapper v. Graziano
New York Supreme Court
41 Misc. 3d 401, 470 N.Y.S.2d 355 (2013)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
The Weinstein Company, JustJenn Productions, VH1, Marrow Media Company, Viacom Media Networks, Electus, and Left/Right, Inc. (the media companies) (defendants) were involved in the production of the reality television show Mob Wives. Renee Graziano (defendant) was one of four participants whose lives were documented for the show. Graziano decided to undergo a full body lift procedure with plastic surgeon Dr. Andrew Klapper (plaintiff). Dr. Klapper agreed to allow the procedure to be filmed for the show. As part of the agreement, Left/Right had Dr. Klapper sign an appearance release, which contained an exculpatory clause barring Dr. Klapper from suing Left/Right or any other company involved in the production of the show for claims related to his appearance on the show. During the surgery, there was a complication. Dr. Klapper kicked the film crew out of the operating room. Eventually, Graziano had to be transferred for emergency treatment. The incident was discussed on the show by the cast members, and Graziano described it as a near-death experience. Graziano further repeated claims that Dr. Klapper had committed medical negligence while doing media appearances outside of the show. Dr. Klapper filed suit for defamation. The media companies brought forward a motion to dismiss, asserting that the claim was barred by the exculpatory clause within the appearance release. Dr. Klapper argued that allowing parties to exempt themselves from tortious conduct via contract violated public policy.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bernard, Graham, J.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.