Klein v. Klein
Texas Court of Appeals
638 S.W.2d 94 (1982)
- Written by Serena Lipski, JD
Facts
Joseph Klein was an insurance agent with Massachusetts Casualty Insurance Company (MCIC) (defendant). Under Joseph’s contract with MCIC, called the Agent’s Agreement, Joseph was entitled to commissions for renewals of insurance policies he had sold. A second document, called Designation of Death Beneficiary for Commissions under Agent’s Agreement, permitted an agent to designate a beneficiary to receive renewal commissions after the agent’s death. The Designation of Death Beneficiary was expressly an amendment to the Agent’s Agreement, and any change in beneficiary required MCIC’s consent and recording in MCIC’s home office. Joseph executed a Designation of Death Beneficiary designating his son from a previous marriage, Donald Klein (defendant), as beneficiary on April 9, 1979. In an affidavit, James Lyons, MCIC’s general counsel, averred that Lyons filled in Donald Klein’s name before sending the document to Joseph. However, Lyons’s cover letter directed Joseph to fill in his new beneficiary, and Lyons may have sent the completed document to Donald instead of Joseph. On June 9, 1979, Joseph executed a will bequeathing his renewal commissions to his wife, Annabelle Klein, consistent with Joseph’s statements in April 1979. After Joseph’s death, MCIC began paying Joseph’s commissions to Donald. Annabelle sued Donald and MCIC seeking the commissions. Annabelle argued that the designation was testamentary and changed by Joseph’s later will. Annabelle claimed that when Joseph executed the document, he signed it in blank and never saw the completed document. The trial court granted summary judgment dismissing Annabelle’s claim, holding that the April 9, 1979, designation of death beneficiary controlled the commissions’ disposition rather than the will. Annabelle appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Guittard, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.