Klein v. Sears, Roebuck, and Co.

608 A.2d 1276 (1992)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Klein v. Sears, Roebuck, and Co.

Maryland Court of Special Appeals
608 A.2d 1276 (1992)

EL

Facts

Joseph Klein (plaintiff) severed four fingers while using a 10-inch radial-arm saw. Klein sued the saw manufacturer, Emerson Electric Co., and the store where he purchased the saw, Sears, Roebuck, and Co. (collectively, the saw companies) (defendants), claiming breach of warranty and strict liability in tort. Klein argued the saw was unreasonably dangerous due to a design defect because it lacked a lower blade guard. Klein testified that he had read the saw’s product warnings, including warnings about not leaving the saw running while unattended or while performing project layout, assembly, or setup work. The warnings also cautioned against reaching behind or around the moving blade. Klein testified that he left the saw running in between repetitive rip cuts (cutting a board lengthwise to make multiple, narrower pieces from the larger piece of wood). Klein’s expert witness was prepared to testify that it was not customary practice for woodworkers to turn off a saw during rip cutting. Klein also testified that he left the saw running while moving within his garage to place finished work in a designated spot and then taking his next piece of wood to the saw. Klein’s expert witness was prepared to testify this process did not force Klein to position himself improperly in relation to the saw and did not constitute layout, assembly, or setup work. The saw companies moved for summary judgment in the circuit court after Klein’s testimony. The saw companies alleged that had Klein heeded the saw’s instructions and warnings, he would not have been injured. The circuit court granted the motion for summary judgment. Klein appealed, arguing that the warnings on the saw were too general and that his specific conduct was not prohibited by the warnings.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bloom, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership