Kline v. Coldwell, Banker & Co.

508 F.2d. 226 (1974)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kline v. Coldwell, Banker & Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
508 F.2d. 226 (1974)

Facts

In 1970, Mr. and Mrs. Kline (plaintiffs) sold their home in Los Angeles County for $42,500. They paid their real estate broker a 6 percent commission, totaling $2,550. Mr. and Mrs. Sherman also sold their home in Los Angeles County and paid a 6 percent commission totaling $2,700. The Klines later sued 32 named real estate brokers and five associations of brokers (brokers) (defendants), alleging that the named brokers and additional unidentified brokers had conspired to set an inflated commission rate for residential real estate sales. The complaint asked the district court to certify a class of approximately 400,000 sellers and a class of approximately 2,000 brokers. The Klines proposed to identify members of the class of brokers by having the court order the five named associations of brokers to provide lists of the names and addresses of all of their members during the four years prior to the filing of the lawsuit. The members of the class of sellers would then be identified by having the court order that each member of the class of brokers provide the names and addresses of each person who paid the broker a commission for the sale of residential real estate during the same four-year period. The Klines proposed sending a notice to each identified member of the class of sellers, informing them of the right to opt out of participation in the class but assuring them that they would incur no financial obligations for choosing not to opt out. As evidence of the alleged conspiracy, the Klines relied on a commission schedule that the Los Angeles Realty Board had distributed to its members. The district court granted the Klines’ request to certify both classes, and the brokers appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Trask, J.)

Concurrence (Duniway, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership