Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Kline v. Kline

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
57 Pa. 120 (1868)


Facts

Gabriel Kline and Ann Hendricks (defendant) were married for 17 years. On the night before their wedding, Gabriel read an antenuptial agreement to Ann. An antenuptial agreement is a written agreement between parties who are about to marry, specifying the parties’ property rights during the marriage and their distribution in the event of dissolution of the marriage. Ann could not speak English. The agreement left Ann with $40 per year and a mere life estate in portions of the family home. A life estate is an interest in real property that is held only for the life of the holder and in which the holder possesses no future interest beyond her lifetime. Although a life estate is transferrable, the interest remains limited to the lifetime of the original holder of the life estate, and the future interest passes to the remaindermen at the life-estate holder’s death. Following Gabriel’s death, Samuel Kline and Dillman Bean (plaintiffs) sought to use the antenuptial agreement to prevent Ann from claiming a share of Gabriel’s estate. Ann, then a 70-year old, childless widow, challenged the validity of the contract. Ann alleged that Gabriel was dishonest with her regarding the extent of his wealth and what she would receive upon his death. At trial, the judge gave a jury instruction that Ann was bound to exercise her good judgment in agreeing to the contract and that Gabriel was not bound to reveal to her the value of his estate. Ann challenged the jury instruction when it was given, and the instruction was assigned as error on appeal.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Sharswood, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.