Klinger v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

115 F.3d 230 (1997)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Klinger v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
115 F.3d 230 (1997)

RW

Facts

After being seriously injured in an automobile accident, Mark Klinger (plaintiff) tendered an underinsured-motorist claim to his insurer, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) (defendant). State Farm forced Klinger to arbitrate the claim. The arbitration proceedings dragged on, thanks in large part to the negligence of State Farm’s lawyer. State Farm was aware of its lawyer’s lax conduct, had all the information it needed to process Klinger’s claim, and knew that Klinger was entitled to collect under his policy. Nevertheless, State Farm offered nothing to Klinger and even sought to delay the arbitration hearing. When the hearing finally took place, two years after the accident, the arbitrators awarded Klinger full recovery on his claim. Klinger sued State Farm under Pennsylvania’s insurance bad-faith statute. The federal-court jury that heard the diversity case awarded punitive damages to Klinger. State Farm appealed to the Third Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Nygaard, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership