Klinicki v. Lundgren

695 P.2d 906 (1985)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Klinicki v. Lundgren

Oregon Supreme Court
695 P.2d 906 (1985)

Facts

F. R. Klinicki (plaintiff) and Kim Lundgren (defendant) were pilots and coworkers stationed in West Germany. After both men were furloughed, Klinicki discussed the possibility of starting an air-transportation business in Berlin with Lundgren. Lundgren expressed interest, and in April 1997 the men formed Berlinair, Inc., a closely held Oregon corporation. Klinicki owned 33 percent of Berlinair’s stock. At the time of formation, Klinicki and Lundgren contemplated pursuing a contract with Berliner Flug Ring (BFR), a prominent association of Berlin travel agents that frequently hired pilots to fly German tourists around. In November 1997, Klinicki and Lundgren had an initial meeting with BFR. Thereafter, either Lundgren or Lundgren’s subordinates exclusively spoke with BFR’s representatives because Lundgren handled Berlinair’s operations. At first, Lundgren thought a contract was unobtainable because BFR indicated satisfaction with its current carrier. However, in June 1978, Lundgren learned that the contract might be available. Lundgren kept this information to himself, formed a new company of his own, Air Berlin Charter Company (ABC) (defendant), and obtained the BFR contract for ABC. Klinicki, as a minority shareholder in Berlinair, filed a derivative claim against ABC for usurpation of a corporate opportunity, as well as an individual claim against Lundgren for breach of his fiduciary duty to Berlinair. The trial court ruled in Klinicki’s favor. ABC appealed and argued that it did not usurp a corporate opportunity from Berlinair because Berlinair did not have the financial ability to undertake the BFR contract. The appellate court affirmed. ABC appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Jones, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership