Klump v. Nazareth Area School District

425 F. Supp. 2d 622 (2006)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Klump v. Nazareth Area School District

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
425 F. Supp. 2d 622 (2006)

Facts

Christopher Klump (plaintiff) was a student at a public school that had a policy against students displaying or using cell phones. Shawn Kimberly Kocher (defendant), a teacher at the school, saw Klump’s cell phone, confiscated it, and brought it to the assistant principal, Margaret Grube (defendant). Kocher and Grube, in an effort to detect other students who may have been using cell phones at school, accessed Klump’s phone’s directory, Klump’s voicemails, and Klump’s text messages. On Klump’s phone, Kocher and Grube called nine other students and messaged Klump’s younger brother. While in possession of the phone, Kocher and Grube also saw a text message from Klump’s girlfriend requesting a tampon, which Grube interpreted to be slang for a marijuana cigarette. Klump brought an action for damages pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Kocher, Grube, and the school district (defendant), alleging, in part, violations of his Fourth Amendment right not to be subjected to an unreasonable search. The case was removed to federal court, where Kocher and Grube filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that they enjoyed qualified immunity.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gardner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership