Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Knapp v. North American Rockwell Corporation

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
506 F.2d 361 (1974)


Facts

Stanley Knapp Jr. (plaintiff) injured his hand in a machine that had been designed and manufactured by Textile Machine Works (TMW) and sold to his employer, Mrs. Smith’s Pie Company (Mrs. Smith’s) (defendant). Knapp’s injury occurred 13 months after TMW had entered into an agreement with North American Rockwell Corporation (Rockwell) (defendant) to sell all of TMW’s assets in exchange for Rockwell stock. TMW retained only its corporate seal, articles of incorporation, corporate documents, and cash connected to the asset transfer, and performed no operations or transactions. TMW also agreed to dissolve the corporation as soon as practicable. The agreement stipulated that Rockwell would assume certain liabilities of TMW, except those for which TMW was insured or indemnified. Prior to the exchange with Rockwell, TMW had procured insurance that would have indemnified TMW against liability to Knapp. TMW was fully dissolved nearly six months after Knapp’s injury. Knapp filed suit in federal district court against Rockwell for damages related to the injury, alleging negligence. Mrs. Smith’s was joined as a third-party defendant. Rockwell moved for summary judgment, arguing that Rockwell was neither a merger or consolidation with, nor a continuation of, TMW. The district court agreed and granted Rockwell’s motion. Knapp appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Adams, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.