Supreme Court of Missouri
98 S.W. 70 (1906)
Anna Knapp (plaintiff) sued St. Louis Trust Company (bank) (defendant) to contest the validity of Margaret Gaffey's will, on the ground that Gaffey was not of sound mind and was under undue influence when she executed the will. Before Gaffey's death, Dr. McWilliams visited Gaffey’s home to provide treatment and received payment for those visits. In his account book, McWilliams noted the visits and payments, as well as the hyperaemia, brain softening, and paralysis for which he treated Gaffey during his visits. McWilliams died before trial. The trial judge admitted McWilliams' account book as evidence only that McWilliams charged Gaffey for visits on certain dates. The trial ended in judgment for the bank. Knapp appealed to the Supreme Court of Missouri, arguing McWilliams' account book should also have been admitted as evidence of the nature of Gaffey's disease.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Gantt, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.