Knight v. Commissioner

552 U.S. 181 (2008)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Knight v. Commissioner

United States Supreme Court
552 U.S. 181 (2008)

JC

Facts

Michael Knight (plaintiff) was the trustee of the William L. Rudkin Testamentary Trust (the trust). In the tax year 2000, the trust held about $2.9 million in marketable securities as assets. Knight paid Warfield Associates, Inc., $22,241 for investment advisory fees related to the trust’s assets. That year, the trust reported income of $624,816 in its fiduciary income-tax return and deducted the fees paid to Warfield in full. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (defendant) ruled in an audit that those fees were subject to a 2 percent adjusted-gross-income floor and were only deductible to the extent they exceeded that mark. Accordingly, there was a deficiency of $4,448. In general, the Internal Revenue Code provided that a trust was taxed the same as an individual, except that deductions for costs paid in connection with administering the trust that would not have been incurred if the property were not held in trust were allowed in full, rather than being subject to a 2 percent adjusted-gross-income floor, as those administrative costs would be with an individual taxpayer. Knight filed suit in the Tax Court, arguing that the fees had been incurred in fulfilling his duty as trustee and thus should be deductible in full. The government argued that because investment fees were commonly or customarily incurred by individuals, they were not exempted from the 2 percent floor. The tax court ruled for the government. Knight appealed, and the Second Circuit found likewise. Knight then appealed to the United States Supreme Court, which granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Roberts, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership