Knitwaves, Inc. v. Lollytogs, Ltd.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
71 F.3d 996 (1995)
- Written by Jody Stuart, JD
Facts
Knitwaves, Inc. (plaintiff), a manufacturer of children’s knitwear, registered copyrights for two sweater designs, Leaf and Squirrel. The Leaf sweater had shadow stripes with leaf felt appliques. The Squirrel sweater had a four-paneled front with squirrel and leaf felt appliques. Both sweaters used an autumn color palette. Subsequently, Lollytogs, Ltd. (defendant) released competing leaf and squirrel sweaters, admittedly copied from Knitwaves’ designs. Lollytogs’ sweaters featured leaf and squirrel felt appliques that looked like Knitwaves’, shadow-striped (leaf sweater) or four-panel (squirrel sweater) backgrounds, and an autumn color palette. Knitwaves filed a complaint in federal district court for copyright infringement. The district court used the ordinary-observer test for substantial similarity and found copyright infringement. Lollytogs appealed, arguing that the district court should have used a more discerning ordinary-observer test for substantial similarity and excluded the unprotectable design elements, instead of comparing the overall sweater designs. Lollytogs provided a detailed list of the differences in its sweaters from Knitwaves’ sweaters.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Oakes, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.