From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
Knitz v. Minster Machine Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
432 N.E.2d 814 (1982)
- Written by Dan Lake, JD
Facts
Minster (defendant) manufactured a die press that delivered great force when activated. The press was typically activated with a button requiring two hands, to keep the operator’s hands outside of the danger area. Minster also sold an optional foot pedal that could activate the press instead of the two-hand button. Knitz (plaintiff) was using Minster’s die press with the foot pedal, when she accidentally depressed the foot pedal while her hand was on the press. The machine amputated two of her fingers, and Knitz brought a strict liability claim against Minster for her injuries. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Minster, and Knitz appealed the decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brown, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
