Knupp v. District of Columbia

578 A.2d 702 (1990)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Knupp v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
578 A.2d 702 (1990)

  • Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD
Play video

Facts

The decedent’s will stated that after paying estate expenses and making certain bequests, the remainder of his estate was to be distributed to the residual beneficiary named in the will. However, no residual beneficiary was named in the will. The decedent’s two prior wills provided substantial bequests to his friend, Richard Knupp. Milton Schober, the attorney who drafted the decedent’s wills, submitted an affidavit to the trial court, stating that the decedent told him to name Knupp as the residual beneficiary in the decedent’s most recent will, but that Schober had mistakenly failed to do so. The trial court held that it could not insert Knupp’s name into the will, and that the decedent’s residual estate therefore escheated to the District of Columbia. Knupp appealed, arguing that extrinsic evidence showed that the decedent intended his residuary estate to go to Knupp, and that Knupp’s name was omitted from the will by mistake.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Newman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 735,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 735,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 735,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership