Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Knussman v. Maryland

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
272 F.3d 625 (4th Cir. 2001)


Facts

Howard Knussman (plaintiff) was a Maryland state trooper. Knussman’s wife was going through a complicated pregnancy and continued to have health-related problems after their child was born. A Maryland statute allowed state employees who were primary caregivers to use up to 30 days of sick leave to care for a newborn. The statute defined a primary caregiver as an employee who was primarily responsible for the care and nurturing of a child. The statute also allowed state employees who were secondary caregivers to use up to 10 days of sick leave to care for a newborn. Due to his wife’s health-related problems, Knussman requested 30 days of sick leave to care for his wife and newborn child. Knussman stated that he was performing the majority of the essential caregiving functions, such as diaper changing, feeding, bathing, and taking the child to the doctor. Jill Mullineaux (defendant), a member of the state police’s personnel division, denied Knussman’s request. In speaking to Knussman on the issue, Mullineaux stated that only women could be primary caregivers under the statute. Knussman brought suit against the State of Maryland, Mullineaux, and others (defendants), alleging a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The trial court found that every state employee-defendant was entitled to qualified immunity, except Mullineaux, and ruled in favor of Knussman. Mullineaux appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Traxler, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.