Kobe v. Montana State Fund

2005 MTWCC 38 (2005)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kobe v. Montana State Fund

Montana Workers’ Compensation Court
2005 MTWCC 38 (2005)

Facts

Bonnie Kobe (plaintiff) was employed by Ruby Valley National Bank (Ruby) from October 1998 until January 2004. Kobe worked five days a week, eight hours each day. Ruby had about a 30-minute commute each way. In November 2001, Kobe injured her neck at work. Ruby’s insurer, the Montana State Fund (defendant), paid medical benefits to Kobe and gave her a 6 percent impairment award. After her injury, Kobe was treated by several physicians, but she continued working full-time despite the pain. In January 2004, Kobe left her employment with Ruby and began working for Beaverhead Bank (Beaverhead) three days a week, nine hours each day. Beaverhead was a five-minute commute. Kobe did not suffer a wage loss with her change in employment. Kobe was not medically restricted from full-time work but chose to work part-time at Beaverhead. One of the considerations Kobe made in working part-time was to see her grandchildren more often. Kobe was financially secure enough that she did not have to work, and her pain decreased over time. Although Kobe received a 6 percent impairment award, she filed for permanent partial-disability benefits.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McCarter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership