Koepnick v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
Arizona Court of Appeals
762 P.2d 609 (1988)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Max Koepnick (plaintiff) was detained in a shopping mall parking lot by two Sears Roebuck & Company (Sears) (defendant) security guards, who suspected Koepnick of shoplifting a wrench. One of the security guards, Lessard, called the police. During their investigation, the police officer and Lessard learned that Koepnick had receipts for the wrench and for all of the other merchandise purchased, which was verified by a Sears employee. To determine whether a second wrench may have been stolen, the police officer and Lessard searched Koepnick’s pickup truck that was located in the mall parking lot. No other items were found. The police officer cited Koepnick for disorderly conduct and released him. The entire ordeal lasted approximately 45 minutes. Koepnick filed suit against Sears for trespass to chattel. After a trial, a jury held for Koepnick and awarded him $100 compensatory damages and $25,000 punitive damages. Thereafter, the trial court granted Sears’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Koepnick appealed and Sears cross appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Froeb, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.