Koffman v. Garnett
Supreme Court of Virginia
574 S.E.2d 258 (2003)
When he was 13 years old, Andrew Koffman (Andrew) joined a football team. He had never played football before. Early in the season, the team’s assistant coach, James Garnett (defendant), criticized the boys’ tackling skills. Garnett then commanded Andrew to hold a football and to stand upright, motionless. Garnett lifted Andrew at least two feet off the ground and slammed him down. Andrew weighed approximately 144 pounds; Garnett weighed 260. The force of Garnett’s throw broke Andrew’s arm. Prior to the incident, coaches had never used physical force as a form of instruction. Andrew’s parents, Richard and Rebecca Koffman (plaintiffs), individually and on behalf of Andrew, sued Garnett in a Virginia court for gross negligence, assault, and battery. The trial court dismissed the complaint. The Koffmans appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lacy, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Kinser, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.