Kolbe v. Hogan
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
849 F.3d 114 (2017)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Maryland’s Firearm Safety Act (FSA), enacted in 2013 in response to a nationwide increase in mass shootings, banned military-style semiautomatic rifles—for example, the AR-15—that the act deemed to be assault weapons. The FSA also prohibited the sale or manufacture of magazines with a capacity above 10 rounds. Stephen Kolbe and Andrew Turner (plaintiffs) challenged the constitutionality of the FSA in federal district court, arguing that both the banned assault weapons and high-capacity magazines served valid purposes of self-defense. Kolbe and Turner’s claims were based primarily on the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. The state (defendant) contended that assault weapons and high-capacity magazines enabled shooters to achieve much greater lethality than more-traditional firearms, putting more innocent civilians and police officers at risk. The court applied intermediate scrutiny and upheld the statute, grating summary judgment in favor of the state. A panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed, holding that the district court should have applied strict scrutiny. The same court then heard the case en banc.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (King, J.)
Dissent (Traxler, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
