Logourl black

Konic International Corporation v. Spokane Computer Services, Inc.

Idaho Court of Appeals
708 P.2d 932 (1985)


David Young, an employee of Spokane Computer Services, Inc. (Spokane) (defendant) was instructed by his superior to purchase a surge protector for his company. Young inquired about the price of surge protectors manufactured by Konic International Corporation (Konic), and was informed the price was “fifty-six twenty.” The Konic salesman meant the price was $5,620.00, but Young understood it to be $56.20. Young prepared a purchase order for $56.20 and obtained approval for the purchase order from his superior. Young placed the order with Konic, and Konic shipped the surge protector to Spokane where it was installed and immediately used. Due to internal processing errors, the discrepancy in the price on Spokane’s purchase order and Konic’s invoice was not immediately noticed. The discrepancy was first noticed by Spokane’s president when he returned from vacation. Spokane’s president requested that Young verify the price with Konic, but Young failed to do so. As a result, the discrepancy in price went unnoticed by Spokane for another two weeks. Once Spokane’s president learned of the actual discrepancy in price, he telephoned Konic and told Konic that Young had no authority to order the surge protector, that Spokane did not want it, and that it should be removed. Konic responded that the surge protector was Spokane’s property now, and that if the balance owed on the price was not paid, Konic would sue Spokane. Spokane did not pay the balance, and Konic brought suit against Spokane. The suit was heard before an Idaho magistrate. The magistrate held Young had no actual or apparent authority to order the surge protector, and found Spokane not liable for the balance. The Idaho state court affirmed, and Konic appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.


The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Walters, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.