Konkel v. Golden Plains Credit Union
Colorado Supreme Court
778 P.2d 660 (1989)
- Written by Heather Whittemore, JD
Facts
In 1978 Golden Plains Credit Union (Golden Plains) (plaintiff) financed the purchase of two combines by Duane Lewis. Golden Plains filed a financing statement in Hamilton County, Kansas, where Lewis lived. In October 1979, Lewis moved the combines to a farm he had purchased in Colorado. Lewis may have moved to Colorado at this time. Four months later, Lewis sold one of the combines to Bud Konkel (defendant). Konkel sold the combine to a farmer in Colorado. Golden Plains never filed a second financing statement in Colorado. Golden Plains filed a conversion lawsuit in Colorado state court against Konkel, seeking the return of the combine. Golden Plains moved for summary judgment, arguing that it held a perfected security interest in the combine when Konkel purchased it. Konkel moved for summary judgment, arguing that Golden Plains lost its security interest in the combine when it failed to file a new financing statement within four months of Lewis bringing the combine into Colorado. The trial court granted summary judgment for Konkel. The court of appeals reversed, holding that Golden Plains retained its security interest in the combine for four months after Lewis moved to Colorado, not four months after the combine was brought into Colorado. The court of appeals remanded the case for the trial court to determine when Lewis moved to Colorado. The Colorado Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine whether Golden Plains perfected its security interest in the combine and, if so, when that interest expired.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Vollack, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.