Koricic v. Beverly Enterprises Nebraska

278 Neb. 713 (2009)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Koricic v. Beverly Enterprises Nebraska

Nebraska Supreme Court
278 Neb. 713 (2009)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

In 1958, Manda Baker immigrated to the United States from Croatia. Baker had limited English skills. In 1966, Frank Koricic (plaintiff), Baker’s son, also immigrated to the United States, and for the next 40 years he lived with Baker. In 1998, Baker’s health began declining, and when she needed to go to the hospital, Baker authorized Koricic to sign medical documents for her. Koricic would discuss the documents with Baker in advance and signed them only with her permission. In November 2005, Koricic took Baker to Beverly Hallmark (defendant), a nursing home to which Baker wished to be admitted. At all relevant times, Baker was of sound mind. While Baker waited in a room, Koricic accompanied a Beverly Hallmark employee into an office and signed admission documents on Baker’s behalf. Koricic and Baker had discussed in advance that Koricic was authorized to sign the mandatory paperwork for admission. One of the documents that Koricic signed in the office was an arbitration agreement that Beverly Hallmark presented to all potential residents. The agreement was optional and expressly stated that it was “not a condition of admission.” Koricic did not subsequently show any of the paperwork to Baker or discuss it with her. In 2007, Baker died. Koricic, as Baker’s relative and trustee of Baker’s estate, sued Beverly Hallmark and its related entities (defendants), alleging negligence and other claims with regard to the nursing home’s treatment of Baker. Beverly Hallmark moved to compel arbitration, which the trial court granted. Koricic appealed, arguing that he had no actual or apparent authority to sign the arbitration agreement on Baker’s behalf, rendering the arbitration agreement unenforceable.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Connolly, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership