Kothe v. Jefferson
Illinois Supreme Court
455 N.E.2d 73 (Ill. 1983)
Vera Shaw (plaintiff) owned a tract of land and signed an oil and gas lease thereon with John Jefferson (defendant). Jefferson assigned a portion of the oil and gas lease, and numerous subsequent assignments of portions of the lease were made. The leasehold was continuously developed on certain portions, but was not developed on many of the specific portions that Jefferson had assigned. As a result, Shaw—and later Shubrick Kothe, as executor of Shaw’s estate—brought suit to cancel those portions of the assigned lease on which the land was not further developed. The trial court granted Kothe’s motion for summary judgment. Jefferson appealed, arguing that the implied covenant to further develop is indivisible. The court of appeals reversed the grant of summary judgment. Kothe appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Moran, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.