Kraemer v. Grant County
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
892 F.2d 686 (1990)
- Written by Alexis Tsotakos, JD
Facts
Mark D. Lawton, a recent law school graduate and new attorney, was contacted by Laura Kraemer (plaintiff) for representation in a suit against the sheriff of Grant County (defendant) and Bill and Betty Baker. Kraemer alleged that the sheriff and the Bakers had conspired to evict her from her rented home and steal her possessions. Before filing suit, Lawton had Kraemer write him a letter detailing the facts of her case. As a result of the letter, Lawton filed an administrative claim, which was denied. Lawton subsequently hired a private investigator to research Kraemer’s claims, but the investigator was unable to confirm or invalidate her story. Lawton went ahead with Kraemer’s suit, which survived a motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 12(b)(6), but which was later dismissed on a motion for summary judgment. The sheriff and the Bakers also filed a motion to have Kraemer or Lawton pay their attorneys fees. The court found that an award against Lawton was appropriate, and he was sanctioned under Rule 11. Lawton appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.