Kramer v. Nowak
United States District Court for Eastern District of Pennsylvania
908 F. Supp. 1281 (1995)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Attorney Steven Kramer (plaintiff) sued former associate Jeffrey Nowak (defendant) for miscalculating prejudgment interest. Kramer hired Nowak to assist on an antitrust case. The jury returned a judgment for the client for $11.5 million in compensatory damages and $50 million in punitive damages. Kramer directed Nowak to prepare a motion for prejudgment interest. Nowak prepared a motion requesting approximately $4 million of prejudgment interest. The judge reduced the damages award, rejecting punitive damages and reducing the compensatory-damages award by $2 million, and approved prejudgment interest of $2 million instead of the $4 million requested. Kramer appealed without challenging the prejudgment-interest calculation. The client sued Kramer for malpractice. According to Kramer, the malpractice claim resulted in an arbitral award against him for $440,000. Kramer then sued Nowak for negligence, breach of contract, and contribution to shift part of the arbitral award onto Nowak, claiming Nowak was an independent contractor. Nowak moved to dismiss or for summary judgment, arguing he could not be liable as Kramer’s employee.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pollak, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.