Kramer v. Nowak

908 F. Supp. 1281 (1995)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kramer v. Nowak

United States District Court for Eastern District of Pennsylvania
908 F. Supp. 1281 (1995)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Attorney Steven Kramer (plaintiff) sued former associate Jeffrey Nowak (defendant) for miscalculating prejudgment interest. Kramer hired Nowak to assist on an antitrust case. The jury returned a judgment for the client for $11.5 million in compensatory damages and $50 million in punitive damages. Kramer directed Nowak to prepare a motion for prejudgment interest. Nowak prepared a motion requesting approximately $4 million of prejudgment interest. The judge reduced the damages award, rejecting punitive damages and reducing the compensatory-damages award by $2 million, and approved prejudgment interest of $2 million instead of the $4 million requested. Kramer appealed without challenging the prejudgment-interest calculation. The client sued Kramer for malpractice. According to Kramer, the malpractice claim resulted in an arbitral award against him for $440,000. Kramer then sued Nowak for negligence, breach of contract, and contribution to shift part of the arbitral award onto Nowak, claiming Nowak was an independent contractor. Nowak moved to dismiss or for summary judgment, arguing he could not be liable as Kramer’s employee.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Pollak, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership