Krause v. City of La Crosse
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
246 F.3d 995 (2001)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Leanna Krause (plaintiff) worked for the finance department of the City of La Crosse (defendant). Krause had several complaints about her job and working conditions, one of which was that she had been moved to a back room in the office that she believed was too messy, cluttered, and dingy. The city hired attorney Susan Love to investigate Krause’s allegations. Ultimately, Krause sued the city for discrimination. At trial, Krause sought to introduce a statement made to Love by Bill Schmidt, the city’s former assistant chief of police. Schmidt had told Love that the back room was dimly lit and not clean and that Krause had clearly been moved there as a disciplinary measure. The trial court excluded the statement as hearsay and granted the city summary judgment. Krause appealed, arguing that the statement was admissible as a statement by party opponent.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Coffey, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.