From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
Krauss v. Oxford Health Plans, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
517 F.3d 614 (2008)
Geri and Daniel Krauss (plaintiffs) were enrolled in a healthcare plan regulated by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and administered by Oxford Health Plans, Inc. (Oxford) (defendant). The plan gave Oxford discretion to implement coverage polices. In 2003 Geri had a double mastectomy and bilateral breast-reconstruction surgery. The Krausses sought reimbursement for the surgeries and the private-duty nursing care they had obtained for Geri. Although the Krausses were charged $40,200 for the breast-reconstruction procedure, Oxford only reimbursed them for $30,200. Oxford claimed that the plan had a usual, customary, and reasonable (UCR) fees provision, under which Oxford was only required to reimburse enrollees according to the cost it deemed reasonable. Oxford had determined the reimbursement amount through its bilateral-surgery policy, under which an enrollee was reimbursed for bilateral procedures at one and a half times the rate of a single procedure. The cost of Geri’s breast-reconstruction procedure was higher than typical because she had used an out-of-network surgeon. Oxford also refused to reimburse the Krausses for the private-duty nursing care on the ground that the plan had a provision excluding private-duty coverage. After exhausting Oxford’s appeal process, the Krausses filed an action in federal district court, claiming that Oxford had violated the plan and the Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act (the women’s health act) and breached its fiduciary duty. The district court returned a verdict for Oxford. The Krausses appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Sack, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 605,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 605,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.