Kriegler v. Eichler Homes, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
269 Cal. App. 2d 224, 74 Cal. Rptr. 749 (1969)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
David Kriegler (plaintiff) bought a home that had been constructed by Eichler Homes, Inc. (Eichler) (defendant). Eichler had employed Arro Company (Arro) (defendant) as the heating contractor. Because of a copper shortage, Arro had obtained steel tubing from General Motors Corporation (General Motors) (defendant), installed the tubing in the home, and guaranteed the radiant-heating system. Arro installed steel-tubing radiant-heating systems in at least 4,000 homes built by Eichler. The radiant-heating system in Kriegler’s home failed because the steel tubing corroded. The repairs required Kriegler to remove and store furniture and temporarily relocate his family. Kriegler sued Eichler and its owner, and Eichler cross-complained against General Motors and Arro. The trial court found Eichler liable to Kriegler on the theory of strict liability because the radiant-heating system, as installed, was defective, and found in favor of General Motors and Arro on Eichler’s cross-complaint. On appeal, Eichler argued that the doctrine of strict liability in tort could not be applied to homes or builders. Eichler appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Taylor, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.