Kriegler v. Eichler Homes, Inc.

269 Cal. App. 2d 224, 74 Cal. Rptr. 749 (1969)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kriegler v. Eichler Homes, Inc.

California Court of Appeal
269 Cal. App. 2d 224, 74 Cal. Rptr. 749 (1969)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

David Kriegler (plaintiff) bought a home that had been constructed by Eichler Homes, Inc. (Eichler) (defendant). Eichler had employed Arro Company (Arro) (defendant) as the heating contractor. Because of a copper shortage, Arro had obtained steel tubing from General Motors Corporation (General Motors) (defendant), installed the tubing in the home, and guaranteed the radiant-heating system. Arro installed steel-tubing radiant-heating systems in at least 4,000 homes built by Eichler. The radiant-heating system in Kriegler’s home failed because the steel tubing corroded. The repairs required Kriegler to remove and store furniture and temporarily relocate his family. Kriegler sued Eichler and its owner, and Eichler cross-complained against General Motors and Arro. The trial court found Eichler liable to Kriegler on the theory of strict liability because the radiant-heating system, as installed, was defective, and found in favor of General Motors and Arro on Eichler’s cross-complaint. On appeal, Eichler argued that the doctrine of strict liability in tort could not be applied to homes or builders. Eichler appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Taylor, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership