Kriegsman v. Kriegsman
New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
375 A.2d 1253, 150 N.J. Super. 474 (1977)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
In December 1975, Mary-Ann Kriegsman (defendant) retained Rose, Poley, Bromley and Landers (the Rose firm) (plaintiff) as counsel in a divorce action against her husband Bernard. Mary-Ann paid the Rose firm $2,000, with the understanding that she would have to pay additional costs during the course of litigation. The Rose firm represented Mary-Ann for over three months, during which time they completed substantial work, including attempting to interface with the uncooperative pro se defendant. As of April 1976, the Rose firm billed Mary-Ann an additional $7,354.50. At that point, Mary-Ann could not afford to pay, and the Rose firm filed an application to withdraw from representation. Mary-Ann contended that the Rose firm should not be permitted to withdraw because it would be too difficult for a new attorney to take over after so much work had already been done. Mary-Ann further contended that the Rose firm was aware of her financial circumstances when they agreed to represent her. The judge denied the Rose firm’s application to withdraw, but set the trial commencement date within the month. The Rose firm appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Michels, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.