Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Kroulik v. Knuppel

Colorado Court of Appeals
634 P.2d 1027 (1981)


Facts

Raymond Knuppel (defendant) purchased property adjoining the property of Charles Kroulik and Claire Kroulik (plaintiffs). Knuppel’s property included the gravel bar between the properties, and Knuppel leased the gravel bar to Burnett Construction Company (Burnett) (defendant), which conducted mining operations to extract minerals for two years. The Krouliks brought suit against Knuppel and Burnett, alleging that the Krouliks owned the gravel bar. The trial court held that the gravel bar belonged to the Krouliks by adverse possession. The Krouliks then sought damages for the extracted gravel and for the destruction of a 73-year-old pine tree. At the damages hearing, an expert witness testified that the pine tree was worth $8.40 for lumber and $229.63 for aesthetic value. The trial court concluded that the defendants were not willful trespassers and that the Krouliks were owed damages in the amount of $1,500 for the aesthetic value of the tree and in the amount of Burnett’s royalty payments made to Knuppel for the extracted minerals. The defendants appealed, arguing that the trial court erred in its award for the aesthetic value of the pine tree. The Krouliks cross-appealed, arguing that the trial court should have used the value of the gravel extracted less the extraction costs to calculate damages.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Kirshbaum, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 223,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.