Krueth v. Independent School District No. 38, Red Lake, Minnesota

496 N.W.2d 829 (1993)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Krueth v. Independent School District No. 38, Red Lake, Minnesota

Minnesota Court of Appeals
496 N.W.2d 829 (1993)

Facts

By statute, Minnesota required public school districts to place teachers on unrequested leaves of absence in order from least senior to most senior teacher. However, Minnesota Statute § 126.501 created an exception to that policy for American Indian teachers. Under § 126.501, districts were allowed to retain a more junior American Indian teacher while placing a more senior non-American Indian teacher on leave. The American Indian Education Act of 1988, which enacted § 126.501, cited the unique academic needs of Minnesota’s American Indian people and the state’s lack of American Indian teachers as justification for the provision. The statute defined American Indian for its purposes as one who is “enrolled or eligible for enrollment in a federally recognized tribe.” A group of non-Indian American tenured teachers (plaintiffs) challenged § 126.501 in court. Among the teachers’ claims was that § 126.501 violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The court found the policy to be lawful, and the teachers appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Randall, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership