Kubicki v. Medtronic

307 F.R.D 291 (2014)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kubicki v. Medtronic

United States District Court for the District of Columbia
307 F.R.D 291 (2014)

Facts

In 2007, Caroline Kubicki suffered permanent brain damage when a medical pump delivered too much insulin into her body to treat diabetes. John and Karen Kubicki (plaintiffs), on behalf of Caroline, filed suit in federal district court against the manufacturers of the pump (defendants), including Medtronic, Inc. (Medtronic) (defendant). The Kubickis alleged negligence, breach of express warranties, and strict liability, and sought discovery as to all of the insulin-infusion devices that Medtronic had manufactured since 1999. Specifically, the Kubickis asked Medtronic to produce (1) post-manufacture and post-injury remedial events and measures; (2) communications and interactions with foreign regulatory agencies; (3) sales, market share, and profit information; and (4) adverse events. Medtronic refused to produce the documents, claiming that the pump model Caroline used was very different from earlier and later models and that the information sought was thus not relevant to any claim or defense. The Kubickis filed a motion to compel discovery.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Facciola, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 748,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership