Kupperstein v. Schall (In re Kupperstein)

994 F.3d 673 (2021)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kupperstein v. Schall (In re Kupperstein)

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
994 F.3d 673 (2021)

Facts

Fred Kuhn died owing approximately $191,000 to MassHealth (creditor) and owning a piece of real property worth $350,000. Donald Kupperstein (debtor) wrongfully claimed the real property and began renting it, pocketing the rent. Kuhn’s estate (creditor), through administrator Irene Schall (creditor), and MassHealth litigated the possession issues with Kupperstein. The probate court ordered Kupperstein to turn over Kuhn’s property and the rent he had collected. Kupperstein did not comply. The probate court held Kupperstein in contempt multiple times and ordered him to pay sanctions. Eventually, the court threatened to jail Kupperstein for contempt. Kupperstein filed for bankruptcy and then claimed the probate court could not touch him because the bankruptcy action had automatically stayed all other actions against him. The probate court jailed Kupperstein for a day and threatened to jail him for 30 days unless he turned over the property’s keys and some unlawfully collected rent. At the next contempt hearing, Kupperstein finally turned over the keys and some cash. Kupperstein then disappeared. The probate court issued a warrant for Kupperstein’s arrest, but he was not located. Schall and MassHealth asked the bankruptcy court to lift the automatic stay on their state-court actions against Kupperstein. Kupperstein’s counsel asked the bankruptcy court to hold MassHealth in contempt for having participated in the probate court’s contempt hearings after the bankruptcy action was filed, arguing those hearings had violated the automatic stay. The bankruptcy court determined that the automatic stay did not apply to the probate court’s contempt proceedings. The bankruptcy court (1) lifted the automatic stay to allow Schall and MassHealth to litigate their court actions against Kupperstein on any issue other than MassHealth’s $191,000 claim against Kupperstein’s bankruptcy estate and (2) dismissed Kupperstein’s motion to hold MassHealth in contempt. The district court affirmed the rulings. Kupperstein appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Thompson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 833,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership