Kutcher v. Housing Authority of the City of Newark

20 N.J. 181, 119 A.2d 1 (1955)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kutcher v. Housing Authority of the City of Newark

New Jersey Supreme Court
20 N.J. 181, 119 A.2d 1 (1955)

Facts

Pursuant to a 1947 executive order (the 1947 executive order), the United States Attorney General created a consolidated list of organizations that were designated in connection with the disloyalty of government employees. The list was subdivided into multiple categories, including one category for subversive organizations. In 1952, Congress passed a law (the federal law) prohibiting members of organizations designated as subversive by the Attorney General from living in federal public housing, and authorized local housing authorities to enforce this prohibition. Hyman Kutcher (plaintiff) was a tenant in a federal public-housing project run by the Housing Authority of the City of Newark (the housing authority) (defendant). Hyman’s son lived with his father in the public-housing apartment. In 1952, the housing authority sent a letter to Kutcher demanding that Kutcher sign a certificate attesting that neither Kutcher nor any family member occupying the apartment was a member of an organization designated as subversive by the attorney general. The certification contained the entire consolidated list, noting that the listed organizations had been designated by the attorney general pursuant to the 1947 executive order. There was no reference to the categories in the attorney general’s list and no indication of which of the listed organizations were designated as subversive. The letter warned that failure to certify would result in eviction. Kutcher refused to sign the certificate. The housing authority sent Kutcher a termination notice, and moved to evict when Kutcher failed to vacate. Kutcher sued. Kutcher claimed that he was not a member of any organization on the certificate list but acknowledged that his son was a member of a listed organization. The court sided with Kutcher, holding that the housing authority had exceeded its authority under the federal law and enjoining the eviction proceedings. The housing authority appealed, further arguing that under the terms of Kutcher’s lease, the housing authority had a contractual right to terminate the lease, regardless of motive, by giving notice to Kutcher.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Heher, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership