Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. Aeropostale, Inc.

676 F.3d 841 (2012)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 30,500+ case briefs...

L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. Aeropostale, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

676 F.3d 841 (2012)

Facts

L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. (Printex) (plaintiff) is a fabric-printing company in Los Angeles. Printex created a floral print with repeating patterns of two flower bouquets with a three-leaf branch between them. There were three flowers in each bouquet. In one bouquet, the largest flower was in profile. In the other bouquet, the largest flower faced front. Printex called this print C30020 and copyrighted it. From 2002 to 2006, Printex sold more than 50,000 yards of C30020 to clothing manufacturers, mostly in the Los Angeles area. In 2008, Printex saw that Aeropostale, Inc. (Aeropostale) (defendant) was selling shirts with a fabric design similar to C30020. The Aeropostale shirt fabric had a pattern of two bouquets on either side of a three-leaf branch. Each bouquet had three flowers. In one bouquet, the largest flower was in profile. In the other bouquet, the largest flower faced front. However, the spacing, color, and definition of the Aeropostale’s shirt’s print varied somewhat from C30020, as did the background. Aeropostale had ordered the shirts from Ms. Bubbles, Inc. (Ms. Bubbles) (defendant), a clothing manufacturer in Los Angeles. Printex sued Aeropostale and Ms. Bubbles for copyright infringement. The district court granted summary judgment for Aeropostale, holding that there was no genuine factual dispute about: (1) whether Aeropostale had access to C30020 to copy it and (2) whether there were substantial similarities between the two prints. Printex appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gould, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 551,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 30,500 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership