L. Albert & Son v. Armstrong Rubber Co.

178 F.2d 182 (1949)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
L
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

L. Albert & Son v. Armstrong Rubber Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
178 F.2d 182 (1949)

SC
Play video

Facts

L. Albert & Son (Albert) (plaintiff) contracted in December 1942 with Armstrong Rubber Co. (Armstrong) (defendant) to sell four machines designed to recondition old rubber. Albert delivered two of the four machines in August 1943, but did not deliver the other two machines until the middle of 1945. Because of this delay, Armstrong refused to accept all four of the machines. Albert brought suit for breach of contract and Armstrong counterclaimed for Albert’s delay in delivery. The trial court dismissed both claims, but ruled in favor of Albert in the amount of the value of a part of the machines that Armstrong actually had put to use. Both parties appealed. Armstrong claimed damages incurred due to its reliance on Albert’s promise, including the $3,000 cost of the foundation it laid for the machines.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hand, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Contracts

Key Terms